Calendario

Julio 2016
LunMarMierJueVierSabDom
 << <Jul 2017> >>
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Anuncio

¿Quién está en línea?

Miembro: 0
Visitantes: 2

rss Sindicación

Anuncio de los artículos posteados en: Julio 2016

Hillary Clinton's Lead Over Trump Shrinks After Controversial Week: Poll - NBCNews.com

Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump narrowed to 3 points this week after several days of controversy following FBI Director James Comey's recommendation that no criminal charges be brought against the former secretary of state over her use of a private email server.

While the developments are certainly good news for the Clinton campaign, Comey's critical statement on Clinton's handling of the matter was not positive. Clinton's lead over Trump has deteriorated in the past couple weeks since her lead peaked two weeks ago.

Related: Track All the Latest Polling in Data Points

A strong majority of voters (82 percent) agreed that it was inappropriate for Clinton to use a personal email server during her tenure as secretary of state. A smaller majority 56 percent also said they disagreed with Comey's recommendation that Clinton not be prosecuted for use of the server.

These results are according to the latest from the NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking Poll conducted online from July 4 through July 10, 2016. Survey questions pertaining to Clinton's email controversy were added following Comey's announcement.



Last Monday, Comey announced the conclusion of the FBI's investigation into Clinton's use of a personal email server during her time as secretary of state. Clinton had been criticized for mishandling classified information and for her administration's reckless treatment of sensitive information. While about eight in 10 of all voters agree that Clinton's use of an email server was "inappropriate," this number also includes nearly seven in 10 of her own supporters.



While a majority of American voters (56 percent) disagree with Comey's recommendation that Clinton should not be prosecuted by the Department of Justice, these attitudes break sharply by candidate support. Though Donald Trump's supporters nearly unanimously (93 percent) disagree with the FBI's conclusions, a majority (78 percent) of Clinton's supporters agree that she should not be prosecuted. A notable two in 10 of Clinton's supporters, however, said they disagreed with Comey's decision as well.



The email controversy seems to have a meaningful impact on voters' impressions of the presumptive Democratic nominee as 66 percent of voters now say she is not honest and trustworthy including a third of her own supporters. This issue was a sticking point for many Democrats during her primary campaign run and is often attributed in part to Bernie Sanders' ability to remain somewhat competitive with Clinton.

While it is unclear what lasting impacts the investigation could have on her bid for presidency, the email investigation's findings do not appear to have moved Clinton's favorability ratings significantly. When respondents were asked their impression of the Democratic candidate in May, 59 percent of voters said they had either a "somewhat" or "very" unfavorable impression of Clinton. This week, amid intense scrutiny, her disapproval rating is now 60 percent virtually unchanged since two months ago. Trump does not appear to have benefited from Clinton's controversy as he also has a 62 percent unfavorable rating this week; identical to his rating among registered voters in May.

The NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking poll was conducted online July 4 through July 10, 2016 among a national sample of 7,869 adults who say they are registered to vote. Respondents for this non-probability survey were selected from the nearly three million people who take surveys on the SurveyMonkey platform each day. Results have an error estimate of plus or minus 1.4 percentage points. For full results and methodology, click here.

12 Jul 2016
Admin · 365 vistas · Escribir un comentario

Beijing South China Sea claims rejected by court - BBC News

Chinese dredging vessels are purportedly seen in the waters around Mischief Reef in the disputed Spratly IslandsImage copyright Reuters Image caption China has accelerated construction on some disputed reefs An international tribunal has ruled against Chinese claims to rights in the South China Sea, backing a case brought by the Philippines.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration said there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or resources.

China called the ruling "ill-founded" and says it will not be bound by it.

China claims almost all of the South China Sea, including reefs and islands also claimed by others.

The tribunal in The Hague said China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights. It also said China had caused "severe harm to the coral reef environment" by building artificial islands.

The ruling came from an arbitration tribunal under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which both countries have signed.

The ruling is binding but the Permanent Court of Arbitration has no powers of enforcement.

The US sent an aircraft carrier and fighter jets to the region ahead of the ruling. Meanwhile, the Chinese Navy has been carrying out exercises near the disputed Paracel islands.

Philippe Sands, a lawyer for the Philippines in the case, said it was a "clear and unanimous judgement that upholds the rule of law and the rights claimed by the Philippines".

He called it a "definitive ruling on which all states can place reliance".

However, the Chinese state news agency Xinhua said that "as the panel has no jurisdiction, its decision is naturally null and void".

The tribunal was ruling on seven of 15 points brought by the Philippines. Among the key findings were:

Fishermen from the Philippines and China both had fishing rights around the disputed Scarborough Shoal area, and China had interfered by restricting accessChina had "destroyed evidence of the natural condition of features in the South China Sea" that formed part of the dispute Transient use of features above water did not constitute inhabitation - one of the key conditions for claiming land rights of 200 nautical miles, rather than the 12 miles granted for rocks visible at high tide.

The BBC's Robin Brant, in Shanghai, says this is the worst outcome for China and its action in the seas hundreds of miles away will be the crucial next step.

In a statement, the Chinese foreign ministry said China was the first to have discovered and exploited the South China Sea islands and relevant waters, "thus establishing territorial sovereignty and relevant rights and interests".

Muted reaction in the Philippines - Jonah Fisher, BBC News, Manila

The press room was packed but the statement from Philippine Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay lasted just two minutes.

In four short paragraphs, he explained that experts were now analysing the ruling and called on all concerned to exercise "constraint and sobriety" at what he described as a "milestone decision".

There were no celebrations, hardly even a smile. And there's a reason for that.

This is not the same government that first brought this case to the Permanent Court of Arbitration three and a half years ago, in the aftermath of a standoff at Scarborough Shoal.

Two weeks ago, Rodrigo Duterte was sworn in as Philippine president. All the indications are that he is more willing to seek accommodation with the Chinese than his predecessor, Benigno Aquino.

Here in Manila, many believe that the new president may have sought promises of Chinese investment, in return for a quiet, dignified response.

12 Jul 2016
Admin · 60 vistas · Escribir un comentario

Don'T Succumb To This Mesothelioma Fraud.

Mesothelioma is just a destructive disease. The books that offer info about asbestos associated mesothelioma cancer can provide patients amazing relief as Realizing the causes of the disease as well as the signs of the present position they're in, is an excellent assistance to experience the discomfort.


Mesothelioma cancer can be a debilitating, fatal sort of cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Due to the fact that asbestosis isn't a sort of lung cancer or mesothelioma cancer, individuals may live many decades, even decades, together with the disease. Mesothelioma is just a cancer that within the frustrating range of cases is caused by direct exposure to asbestos at work. Pleural mesothelioma is easily the most typical of the type of asbestos-caused cancers which have actually killed numerous numerous countless victims. It is frequently revealed to inhibit development of several type of cancer cells in culture.


Conclusion Cerebral metastasis takes place more frequently in lung cancer. Lung cancer may likewise trigger clubbed fingers. The disease does not have a treatment. Direct exposure to asbestos raises your risk of developing lung illness.


About 2,000 to 3,000 new circumstances of mesothelioma cancer are diagnosed in america each fiscal year, based upon national health figures. The research offers a much-needed basis for more research study into triggering resistance within the senior population and may eventually trigger a possible immunotherapeutic treatment for cancer. Mesothelioma, for instance, the most regular asbestos-caused illness, is actually a cancer which has a latency duration of a number of decades. Mesothelioma eliminates many tens and thousands of victims yearly in cases which are overwhelmingly caused by exposure to asbestos. Exposure to asbestos can result in asbestosis, some sorts of lung cancer and, most often, deadly mesothelioma. The importation or use of asbestos was prohibited in Australia considering that 2004.


An experienced mesothelioma attorney will have the capability to counsel you on the appropriate location (place) to submit a claim, reliant on the statute of restrictions and other aspects, as suitable. U.S. Attorney Olson kept in mind the long latency duration of mesothelioma cancer implies that the degree of exposure might not be known for a number of decades.


Every case differs, considering that no 2 people were exposed to the similar asbestos solutions. As a consequence, there's still potential mesothelioma lawyer center for exposure to asbestos in several offices as a result of large amounts of the material used in buildings before. Supplied that the asbestos is really in great shape and there is definitely no disturbance or harm to the asbestos containing material, it isn't really going to pose a danger to health as fibres will not be released." Normally, the bigger the exposure to asbestos, the bigger the opportunity of producing damaging health impacts. The intensity of the symptoms is typically regarding the amount and quantity of asbestos direct exposure. Asbestos poses very little danger when it is not disturbed.


The best method to minimize mesothelioma cancer is to have a proactive position in your health. Cigarette cigarette smoking will not appear to to grow the potential of getting mesothelioma cancer.




Pretty much everybody is currently conscious of the fatal health threats induced by smoking cigarettes, especially the dangerous specter of producing cancer. Amongst the most dangerous components of mesothelioma is that by the time it is identified it's normally so far advanced it can not truly be dealt with through standard approaches like chemotherapy, surgical treatment or radiation. A lot of victims aren't detected with the cancer till it's so far advanced that it's untreatable by common methods such as surgical treatment, radiation or chemotherapy. These tests measure the blood rates of certain compounds which are higher in those who have mesothelioma cancer. Blood tests to look for mesothelioma now are actually being studied. In the USA about 2,000 to 3,000 new instances of mesothelioma cancer are identified every year.


In the conclusion of the legal fight which has actually stretched over over 5 decades, the court ruled that insurance coverage carriers need to need to pay business for the expenses they've incurred in making up workers who hold up against asbestos-related illnesses. In cases like this, the member of the family take legal action against to get compensation about the loss of their cherished. His testimony was supported by numerous medical experts, based on trial records.

01 Jul 2016
Admin · 63682 vistas · Escribir un comentario